<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google announce cross domain canonical link element support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2009/12/16/google-announce-cross-domain-canonical-link-element/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2009/12/16/google-announce-cross-domain-canonical-link-element/</link>
	<description>A holistic overview of Search Marketing &#124; SEO &#124; PPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Young</title>
		<link>http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2009/12/16/google-announce-cross-domain-canonical-link-element/comment-page-1/#comment-3444</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/?p=870#comment-3444</guid>
		<description>Hey Berian

Yahoo and Bing are yet to formally announce any support for the cross domain canonical tag - so it will be interesting to see how they react to the announcement from Google.

That said however, even in Googles official announcement, they have suggested this should be a &#039;last resort&#039;, rather than a first solution - perhaps indicative of how crucial a factor this is considered from Google&#039;s perspective</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Berian</p>
<p>Yahoo and Bing are yet to formally announce any support for the cross domain canonical tag &#8211; so it will be interesting to see how they react to the announcement from Google.</p>
<p>That said however, even in Googles official announcement, they have suggested this should be a &#8216;last resort&#8217;, rather than a first solution &#8211; perhaps indicative of how crucial a factor this is considered from Google&#8217;s perspective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berian Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2009/12/16/google-announce-cross-domain-canonical-link-element/comment-page-1/#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>Berian Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/?p=870#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>Hey Peter, any confirmation from Bing and Yahoo as to whether they will also be supporting cross domain canonical?

If not I would steer clear of this unless it truly is your last resort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter, any confirmation from Bing and Yahoo as to whether they will also be supporting cross domain canonical?</p>
<p>If not I would steer clear of this unless it truly is your last resort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

