<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google expands favicon testing on Paid Search ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2009/03/31/google-expands-favicon-testing-on-paid-search-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2009/03/31/google-expands-favicon-testing-on-paid-search-ads/</link>
	<description>A holistic overview of Search Marketing &#124; SEO &#124; PPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Instant Web Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2009/03/31/google-expands-favicon-testing-on-paid-search-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Instant Web Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holisticsearch.co.uk/?p=477#comment-676</guid>
		<description>This is VERY odd considering people can sue for usage of favicons….. I’d love to hear more on the legalities of this. Perhaps they have permission from the sites they are showing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is VERY odd considering people can sue for usage of favicons….. I’d love to hear more on the legalities of this. Perhaps they have permission from the sites they are showing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

