Comments on: Search engine optimised or search engine optimisation?

By: Simon

Simon — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:19:14 +0000

I agree 100%. Loads of shady companies offering basic on page SEO and dressing it up as a holistic package. This stems from the lack of understanding over what “SEO” is or should be defined as.

By: facundo

facundo — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:08:32 +0000

I agree with the fact that the holistic approach is proving to be necessary to a succesful SEO strategy. However, I do see challenges in the role that agencies have to assume nowadays as opposed to 4 years ago. Seems to me that we will soon see many small and big business owners engaging in producing content (e.g: to be twitteable, facebookeable, etc) and the role of the SEO agency will be more about distributing this content; a hibrid between PR and the former SEO approaches…

By: Paul Anthony

Paul Anthony — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 05:38:15 +0000

Here here. You can’t talk about SEO seriously in today’s marketplace, without mentioning off page factors. It is where 80% of efforts should be put in a successful SEO campaign in my opinion. On page factors only reinforce positioning. That said MSN and other engines are still playing catchup to a degree and from what I’ve seen lean slightly closer towards onpage factors.

By: John

John — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 05:03:45 +0000

Its very true before going for a website its is necessary to optimize to meet the proper means of success. The Keysearch Analytics blog has tips, tricks, advice and case studies for the search marketing industry.