<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DIY-SEO &#8211; Is cheap always best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2008/11/13/diy-seo-is-cheap-always-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2008/11/13/diy-seo-is-cheap-always-best/</link>
	<description>A holistic overview of Search Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:42:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SirBigWig</title>
		<link>http://www.holisticsearch.co.uk/2008/11/13/diy-seo-is-cheap-always-best/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>SirBigWig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holisticsearch.co.uk/?p=98#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Agree whole heartedly that £35 for SEO is absurd and just highlights the utter ignorance some companies have about what they are getting.  Because it is not an actual commodity, people seem to have no idea about how much it should cost.

Equally I think some of the larger digital search agencies have also been guilty of profiteering and charging too much for their services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree whole heartedly that £35 for SEO is absurd and just highlights the utter ignorance some companies have about what they are getting.  Because it is not an actual commodity, people seem to have no idea about how much it should cost.</p>
<p>Equally I think some of the larger digital search agencies have also been guilty of profiteering and charging too much for their services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
